Microsoft Dynamics 365 | Integration, Dataverse...

Dual Write Setup - Requires a new package

(3) Share

Report

Posted on by Craig_Leska

Hi all,

I have a D365 FO Power Platform environment on version 10.0.46 and am currently working on setting up Dual-write. I am running into issues with several table mappings. The error message shown is:

“Dual Write template for sync between FO.CDS Vendor Contacts V2 to CDS.Contacts requires new package [Dynamics365FinanceExtended].”

This "requires new package" message appears on multiple tables.

Could you please advise where this package is obtained from and what may be missing or misconfigured in my current setup?

In 365FO Dual Write Apply Solutions section , I currently have the following applied from AppSource:

Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management extended entity maps - version 2.3.4.551
Dynamics 365 Finance extended entity maps - version 2.5.3256.1
Dynamics 365 Human Resources entity maps - 2.4.1.57
Dual-write applications core entity maps - 2.4.0.337

Any guidance on next steps or required components would be appreciated.

Categories:

Power Platform integration

Dynamics 365 general

I have the same question (0)

All responses (2)

Answers (0)

Suggested answer

André Arnaud de Cal... 303,052 Super User 2026 Season 1 on at

Like (0)

Report
Copy link

Link copied!

Hi Craig,

In Power Platform Admin Center, you can go to the environment and then open the Dynamics 365 resources for this environment. Can you check if there are updates available for the dual write resources?

If so, please update the resources. After that task you can apply solutions on the Dual Write configuration page.

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
Craig_Leska 18 on at

Like (0)

Report
Copy link

Link copied!

Hi André

Updating the resources was the first steps I have taken I do not see anything relevant that needs to be updated.

The mapping in my environment, when i click on the version link i get requires new package messge

I have the following solutions from Appsource. Am i missing anything?

Was this reply helpful? Yes No