web
You’re offline. This is a read only version of the page.
close
Skip to main content

Announcements

No record found.

News and Announcements icon
Community site session details

Community site session details

Session Id :
Customer experience | Sales, Customer Insights,...
Suggested Answer

Single-BU vs Multi-BU Setup

(0) ShareShare
ReportReport
Posted on by 5
We want to set up Dynamics 365 Sales for an international sales organization. It is organized by Sales Regions. Some Sales Regions have Sub-Clusters. Legally the company does not must separate data.
They have VP Global Sales, Regional Sales Heads, Sales Reps, reporting in a straight line (Sales Rep > Regional Sales Head > VP Sales). Additionally, there are some global positions, like Product Managers, Technical Mangers, Business Development Managers.

Account Owners must have a 365-view of their owned accounts, contacts, leads. Certain fields (e.g. price information) must only be visible to the owner/creator and its managers.
They also have Key Account Management with local key accounts in several Sales Regions. They must roll up to Global Key Accounts. Local Key Account Managers must have full visibility of the Global Key Account their local KA belongs to.  Apart from that, almost every user will have org-wide (read, write) permissions.  It is meant to be an open, collaborative setup.
 
Question: Would you set it up with a single or multiple BU and why? Would you recommend Manager or Position Hierarchy? 
 
Any advice, recommendation, or comment is much appriacted.
Thanks
Categories:
I have the same question (0)
  • Suggested answer
    11manish Profile Picture
    367 on at
    For your scenario, I would recommend using a single Business Unit (BU) along with a Manager Hierarchy as the primary approach, and optionally a Position Hierarchy for specific cross-functional roles.
     
    Let’s break it down and give you a practical architecture recommendation.
     
    Business Unit (BU)
    • Use Single BU
    • Reason:
      • No legal data separation required
      • Organization wants open collaboration
      • Easier to manage and maintain
    Hierarchy
    • Use Manager Hierarchy (Primary)
      • Fits your reporting structure (Sales Rep → Regional Head → VP)
      • Automatically gives managers access to their team’s data
    • Use Position Hierarchy (Optional)
      • Only for cross-functional roles (Product Managers, Technical Managers, etc.)
      • When access is not based on reporting line
    Data Access
    • Most users: Org-level read/write access
    • Sensitive fields (e.g., pricing):
      • Use Field Security Profiles
      • Visible only to owner + managers
    Key Account Management
    • Use Account Hierarchy (Parent–Child Accounts)
      • Global Account → Parent
      • Local Accounts → Child
    • Ensures:
      • Local teams can see Global Account
    Regions / Sub-Clusters
    • Do NOT use BUs
    • Use:
      • Fields (Region, Sub-cluster)
      • Optional Teams
    Overall, this approach keeps the system simple, scalable, and aligned with your collaborative business needs while still maintaining control over sensitive data.
     

Under review

Thank you for your reply! To ensure a great experience for everyone, your content is awaiting approval by our Community Managers. Please check back later.

Helpful resources

Quick Links

Introducing the 2026 Season 1 community Super Users

Congratulations to our 2026 Super Stars!

Meet the Microsoft Dynamics 365 Contact Center Champions

We are thrilled to have these Champions in our Community!

Congratulations to the March Top 10 Community Leaders

These are the community rock stars!

Leaderboard > Customer experience | Sales, Customer Insights, CRM

#1
ManoVerse Profile Picture

ManoVerse 192 Super User 2026 Season 1

#2
11manish Profile Picture

11manish 129

#3
CU11031447-0 Profile Picture

CU11031447-0 100

Last 30 days Overall leaderboard

Product updates

Dynamics 365 release plans