Announcements
Hello forum,
Does anyone have a sense for how widely used rules based Territory Management is in MS Dynamics vs manual account assignments? I understand Territory Mgt is available by default, but I'm interested to know whether a high percentage of companies A) have the need for it and B) find Territory Mgt to be a capable feature and use it.
Also interested to know whether Territory Mgt has limitations that prevent a substantial number of companies from using it and what those limitations/scenarios are.
Thanks in advance for any insight/comments received.
Darrin
Hey,
There’s no exact count to back the need for territory management. But as far as a sales team is concerned, territory management is an effective solution. It makes it easy to assign territories. If you go for manual assignments, you may end up assigning the same territory to two or more reps. That won’t be the case with territory management.
However, the demand for territory management depends on your business requirements. If you have limited territories to target that you can count, then you may not have a sheer need for it. But again, it depends on the extension you use. Many mapping tools provide you more than territory management. They equip you with heat maps, live tracking, route optimization, and more.
As for limitations, it again depends on your use and demand. Mappyfield provides all functionality.
André Arnaud de Cal...
294,095
Super User 2025 Season 1
Martin Dráb
232,866
Most Valuable Professional
nmaenpaa
101,158
Moderator